Trade and Investment

What would a wall between the US and Mexico mean for jobs and trade?

The border wall separating the United States and Mexico is pictured in San Ysidro, California, US, January 25, 2017. Image: REUTERS/Mike Blake

Alex Gray
Senior Writer, Formative Content
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Trade and Investment?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Trade and Investment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Trade and Investment

The US and Mexico have a very close trading relationship. On both sides of the border, millions of jobs depend on the business ties between the two countries.

Less than a week into his presidency, Donald Trump signed an executive order to deliver on his campaign pledge to build a wall along the border between the US and Mexico. His assertion that Mexico would pay for the wall prompted a sharp response from the Mexican President, Enrique Peña Nieto and an expletive-laden hashtag that trended on Twitter.

At the heart of President Trump’s plan is the belief that a wall will help slow the flow of undocumented immigrants from Mexico to the US. He has also emphasised the idea that free trade agreements have had a negative effect on American workers and has singled out the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) as one of the worst offenders.

The US & Mexico in Trade

Mexico is one of the US’s biggest trading partners. Both countries enjoy preferential trading status under NAFTA, an agreement between the US, Canada and Mexico that allows the free flow of goods and services between the three countries. The Agreement was negotiated by the Republican administration of George H.W. Bush but was signed by his Democratic successor Bill Clinton.

In 2016, Mexico was the US’s third largest trading partner in physical goods (14.5% of the total) behind China and Canada.

 Figure 1
Image: Statista

President Trump has signaled his intention to withdraw from NAFTA, if he can’t renegotiate it in a way that “gives American workers a fair deal.”

An expert on the subject says the repercussions of not having NAFTA, or of worsening relations between the two countries, are “not good”. Christopher Wilson is a scholar of US-Mexican economic relations at The Wilson Center. He told The Atlantic: “You can get rid of NAFTA, but it will come at an economic cost for both sides. American companies have invested billions and billions of dollars and they are not just going to walk away from those investments just because NAFTA is gone.”

Jobs

What about jobs created by trade between the two countries?

According to the Wilson Centre, nearly five million U.S. jobs depend on trade with Mexico.

 Figure 2
Image: Wilson Center Mexico Institute

According to the US Department of Commerce, in 2014, Mexico-based affiliates of US multinational enterprises employed 1.29 million people with sales of $253.4 billion, while US-based affiliates of Mexican multinational enterprises employed 77,800 people in 2014, an increase of 3.7% from the previous year; with sales of $32.8 billion, up 7.3%.

 Figure 3
Image: US Department of Commerce

According to the Mexican government, 63% of the wealth generated by Mexico is due to its trade with the wider world.

Immigration

The primary goal of President Trump’s wall is to stem the flow of Mexican migrants to America. According to the Pew Research Centre, there were 11.1 million unauthorized immigrants in the US in 2014, of which 52%, or 5.8 million, were Mexicans. This was down from 6.4 million in 2009.

 Figure 4
Image: Pew Research Center

The Wall

The US and Mexico share a 3,200 kilometer long border (1,989 miles). Roughly one third of the border is already demarcated by various types of barrier and it’s estimated that the new wall will cost US$15-25bn.

 The Economics of Trump's Wall
Image: Statista

President Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto were due to meet at the end of January to hammer out their new trading relationship. This meeting has been cancelled by the Mexican administration, infuriated by President Trump’s assertion that Mexico would pay for the wall. Since then, however, the two have apparently enjoyed a "very friendly" phone call.

The future of trade between the two nations looks likely to be affected by trade barriers which could rise alongside the controversial wall along the border.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Trade and InvestmentEconomic Progress
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

International trade: What you need to know this month

Mariam Soumaré

March 28, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum