Infracompetitive Privacy

46 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2018 Last revised: 25 Nov 2019

See all articles by Greg Day

Greg Day

University of Georgia - C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry College of Business; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project

Abbey Stemler

Indiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Business Law; Harvard University - Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society

Date Written: 2019

Abstract

One of the chief anticompetitive effects of modern business lies in antitrust’s blind spot. Platform-based companies (“platforms”) have innovated a business model whereby they offer consumers “free" and low-priced services in exchange for their personal information. With this data, platforms can design products, target consumers, and sell such information to third parties. The problem is that platforms can inflict greater costs on users and markets in the form of lost privacy than efficiencies generated from their low prices. Consumers, as examples, spend billions of dollars annually to remedy privacy breaches and, alarmingly, participate unwittingly in experiments designed to manipulate their behaviors, compromising human agency. But because antitrust law uses consumer prices to measure welfare, platforms and privacy injuries have avoided antitrust scrutiny.

We show that insufficient competition enables platforms to capture the economic benefits of data while externalizing the costs of protecting it. As we find, consumers demand privacy yet firms in monopolized markets have powerful incentives to shift the costs of protecting privacy onto society. To reduce the rate of privacy breaches, we show that increasing competition would 1) allow users to punish offending firms, 2) disseminate information about the true costs of privacy, and 3) introduce more secure services into the market. As such, because monopoly power encourages firms to disregard the privacy demands of users, antitrust must evolve to recognize that the costs of inadequate privacy can degrade consumer welfare more than artificially high prices.

Keywords: Uber, Airbnb, Google, Facebook, Platforms, Antitrust, Privacy, Economics, Markets, Manipulation, Consumer Welfare, Choice, Digital Economy

undefined

Suggested Citation

Day, Gregory and Stemler, Abbey, Infracompetitive Privacy (2019). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 107, Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 18-84, Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 403, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3263172

Gregory Day

University of Georgia - C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry College of Business ( email )

Brooks Hall
Athens, GA 30602-6254
United States

Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Abbey Stemler (Contact Author)

Indiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Business Law ( email )

Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Harvard University - Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society ( email )

Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/abbey-stemler

0 References

    0 Citations

      Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

      Paper statistics

      Downloads
      175
      Abstract Views
      2,495
      Rank
      361,057
      PlumX Metrics
      Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
      • Usage
        • Abstract Views: 2487
        • Downloads: 175
      • Captures
        • Readers: 2
      see details